html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1009548580,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1009548580,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48LH0k,536941,2022-01-11T02:43:34Z,2022-01-11T02:43:34Z,CONTRIBUTOR,thanks so much! always a pleasure to see how you work through these things,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008275546,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008275546,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48GRBa,536941,2022-01-09T11:01:15Z,2022-01-09T13:37:51Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"i don’t want to be such a partisan for analyze, but the query planner deciding *not* to use an index based on information collected by analyze is not necessarily a bug, but could be the correct choice.

<s>the original poster in that stack overflow doesn’t say there’s a performance regression </s>","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008166084,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008166084,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F2TE,536941,2022-01-08T22:32:47Z,2022-01-08T22:32:47Z,CONTRIBUTOR,or using “ pragma optimize”,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008164786,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008164786,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F1-y,536941,2022-01-08T22:24:19Z,2022-01-08T22:24:19Z,CONTRIBUTOR,the out-of-date scenario you describe could be addressed by automatically adding an analyze to the insert or convert commands if they implicate an index,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008164116,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008164116,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F10U,536941,2022-01-08T22:18:57Z,2022-01-08T22:18:57Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"the table with the query ran so bad was about 50k. 

i think the scenario should not be worse than no stats. 

i also did not know that sqlite was so different from postgres and needed an explicit analyze call.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008161965,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008161965,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F1St,536941,2022-01-08T22:02:56Z,2022-01-08T22:02:56Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"for options 2 and 3, i would worry about discoverablity. 

in other db’s it is not necessary to explicitly call analyze for most indices. ie for postgres

> The system regularly collects statistics on all of a table's columns. Newly-created non-expression indexes can immediately use these statistics to determine an index's usefulness.

i suppose i would propose raising a warning if the stats table is created that explains what is going on and informs users about a —no-analyze argument.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1007636709,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1007636709,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48D1Dl,536941,2022-01-07T18:28:33Z,2022-01-07T18:29:43Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"i added an index to one table with sqlite-utils, and then a query that used to take about 1 second started taking hundreds of seconds. 

running analyze got me back to sub second speed.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,