html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-1402900354,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099,1402900354,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Tno-C,536941,2023-01-25T00:58:26Z,2023-01-25T00:58:26Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> My original idea for compound foreign keys was to turn both of those columns into links, but that doesn't fit here because `database_name` is already part of a different foreign key.

it's pretty hard to know what the right thing to do is if a field is part of multiple foreign keys. 

but, if that's not the case, what about making each of the columns a link. seems like an improvement over the status quo.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",743371103,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-1402898291,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099,1402898291,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Tnodz,536941,2023-01-25T00:55:06Z,2023-01-25T00:55:06Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"I went ahead and spiked something together, in #2003 ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",743371103,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-1402563930,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099,1402563930,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5TmW1a,536941,2023-01-24T20:11:11Z,2023-01-24T20:11:11Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"hi @simonw, this bug bit me today.

the UX for linking from a table to the foreign key seems tough! 

the design in the other direction seems a lot easier, for a given primary key detail page, add links back to the tables that refer to the row.

would you be open to a PR that solved the second problem but not the first?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",743371103,