issue_comments: 761179229
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/657#issuecomment-761179229 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/657 | 761179229 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MTE3OTIyOQ== | 9599 | 2021-01-15T20:24:35Z | 2021-01-15T20:24:35Z | OWNER | I'm not sure how I missed this issue but it's almost a year later and I'm finally taking a look at your Parquet work. This is yet more evidence that allowing plugins to provide their own custom I started exploring what Datasette would like on PostgreSQL in #670 - my concern was that I would need to add a large amount of database abstraction code which would dramatically increase the complexity of the core project, but my thinking now is that it might be tractable - Datasette doesn't actually construct SQL in complex ways anywhere outside of the |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
548591089 |