issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 686978131 and user = 96218 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • simonwiles · 2 ✖

issue 1

  • insert_all(..., alter=True) should work for new columns introduced after the first 100 records · 2 ✖

author_association 1

  • CONTRIBUTOR · 2 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
682815377 https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/139#issuecomment-682815377 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/139 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MjgxNTM3Nw== simonwiles 96218 2020-08-28T16:14:58Z 2020-08-28T16:14:58Z CONTRIBUTOR

Thanks! And yeah, I had updating the docs on my list too :) Will try to get to it this afternoon (budgeting time is fraught with uncertainty at the moment!).

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 insert_all(..., alter=True) should work for new columns introduced after the first 100 records 686978131  
682182178 https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/139#issuecomment-682182178 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/139 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MjE4MjE3OA== simonwiles 96218 2020-08-27T20:46:18Z 2020-08-27T20:46:18Z CONTRIBUTOR

I tried changing the batch_size argument to the total number of records, but it seems only to effect the number of rows that are committed at a time, and has no influence on this problem.

So the reason for this is that the batch_size for import is limited (of necessity) here: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/main/sqlite_utils/db.py#L1048

With regard to the issue of ignoring columns, however, I made a fork and hacked a temporary fix that looks like this: https://github.com/simonwiles/sqlite-utils/commit/3901f43c6a712a1a3efc340b5b8d8fd0cbe8ee63

It doesn't seem to affect performance enormously (but I've not tested it thoroughly), and it now does what I need (and would expect, tbh), but it now fails the test here: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/main/tests/test_create.py#L710-L716

The existence of this test suggests that insert_all() is behaving as intended, of course. It seems odd to me that this would be a desirable default behaviour (let alone the only behaviour), and its not very prominently flagged-up, either.

@simonw is this something you'd be willing to look at a PR for? I assume you wouldn't want to change the default behaviour at this point, but perhaps an option could be provided, or at least a bit more of a warning in the docs. Are there oversights in the implementation that I've made?

Would be grateful for your thoughts! Thanks!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 insert_all(..., alter=True) should work for new columns introduced after the first 100 records 686978131  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);