issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 718540751 and user = 45380 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • bollwyvl · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • For 1.0 update trove classifier in setup.py · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • CONTRIBUTOR · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
970266123 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1012#issuecomment-970266123 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1012 IC_kwDOBm6k_c451RYL bollwyvl 45380 2021-11-16T13:18:36Z 2021-11-16T13:18:36Z CONTRIBUTOR

Congratulations, looks like it went through! There was a bit of a hold-up on the JupyterLab ones, but it's semi automated: a dependabot pr to warehouse and a CI deploy, with a click in between.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 For 1.0 update trove classifier in setup.py 718540751  
753531657 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1012#issuecomment-753531657 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1012 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzUzMTY1Nw== bollwyvl 45380 2021-01-02T21:25:36Z 2021-01-02T21:25:36Z CONTRIBUTOR

Actually, on more research, I found out this is handled by the trove-classifiers package now, so it's just a one-liner pr instead of fire-up-a-docker-container-and-do-some-migrations

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 For 1.0 update trove classifier in setup.py 718540751  
714908859 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1012#issuecomment-714908859 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1012 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxNDkwODg1OQ== bollwyvl 45380 2020-10-23T04:49:20Z 2020-10-23T04:49:20Z CONTRIBUTOR

Good luck on 1.0! It may also be worth lobbying for a Framework::Datasette::1.0 classifier. This would be a nice way to allow the ecosystem to self-document a bit more discoverably.

I was surprised to see the PR for Framework::Jupyter is a... database migration! Of course, there may be more workflow to it!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 For 1.0 update trove classifier in setup.py 718540751  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);