issue_comments
12 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 1219385669 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView · 12 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1114038259 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1114038259 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CZt_z | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-30T19:06:03Z | 2022-04-30T19:06:03Z | OWNER |
I think |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1114036946 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1114036946 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CZtrS | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-30T18:56:25Z | 2022-04-30T19:04:03Z | OWNER | Related: - #1558 Which talks about how there was confusion in this example: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable.json?_facet=created&_facet_date=created&_facet=tags&_facet_array=tags&_nosuggest=1&_size=0 Which I fixed in #625 by introducing |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1114037521 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1114037521 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CZt0R | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-30T19:01:07Z | 2022-04-30T19:01:07Z | OWNER | I had to look up what That's a bit of a weird thing to expose in the API. Maybe change that to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1114013757 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1114013757 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CZoA9 | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-30T16:15:51Z | 2022-04-30T18:54:39Z | OWNER | Deployed a preview of this here: https://latest-1-0-alpha.datasette.io/ Examples:
Second example produces:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1112734577 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1112734577 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CUvtx | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-28T23:08:42Z | 2022-04-28T23:08:42Z | OWNER | That prototype is a very small amount of code so far: ```diff diff --git a/datasette/renderer.py b/datasette/renderer.py index 4508949..b600e1b 100644 --- a/datasette/renderer.py +++ b/datasette/renderer.py @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ def convert_specific_columns_to_json(rows, columns, json_cols): def json_renderer(args, data, view_name): """Render a response as JSON""" + from pprint import pprint + + pprint(data) + status_code = 200
@@ -43,6 +47,41 @@ def json_renderer(args, data, view_name): if "rows" in data and not value_as_boolean(args.get("_json_infinity", "0")): data["rows"] = [remove_infinites(row) for row in data["rows"]]
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1112732563 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1112732563 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CUvOT | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-28T23:05:03Z | 2022-04-28T23:05:03Z | OWNER | OK, the prototype of this is looking really good - it's very pleasant to use.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1112730416 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1112730416 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CUusw | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-28T23:01:21Z | 2022-04-28T23:01:21Z | OWNER | I'm not sure what to do about the It's not really relevant to table results, since they are paginated whether or not you ask for them to be. It plays a role in query results, where you might run Adding it to every table result and always setting it to I think I'm going to keep it exclusively in the default representation for the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1112721321 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1112721321 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CUsep | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-28T22:44:05Z | 2022-04-28T22:44:14Z | OWNER | I may be able to implement this mostly in the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1112717745 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1112717745 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CUrmx | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-28T22:38:39Z | 2022-04-28T22:39:05Z | OWNER | (I remain keen on the idea of shipping a plugin that restores the old default API shape to people who have written pre-Datasette-1.0 code against it, but I'll tackle that much later. I really like how jQuery has a culture of doing this.) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1112717210 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1112717210 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CUrea | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-28T22:37:37Z | 2022-04-28T22:37:37Z | OWNER | This means I'll add |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1112716611 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1112716611 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CUrVD | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-28T22:36:24Z | 2022-04-28T22:36:24Z | OWNER | Then I'm going to implement the following
I thought about having I'm tempted to add |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 | |
1112713581 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1729#issuecomment-1112713581 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CUqlt | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-28T22:31:11Z | 2022-04-28T22:31:11Z | OWNER | I'm going to change the default API response to look like this:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView 1219385669 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1