issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 1618249044 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Consider a `strict_templates` setting · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1463112173 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2038#issuecomment-1463112173 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2038 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5XNVHt | simonw 9599 | 2023-03-10T02:11:06Z | 2023-03-10T02:11:06Z | OWNER | Here's an example of something that would break: Because |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Consider a `strict_templates` setting 1618249044 | |
1463110978 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2038#issuecomment-1463110978 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2038 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5XNU1C | simonw 9599 | 2023-03-10T02:09:41Z | 2023-03-10T02:09:41Z | OWNER | I'm torn on this. It's useful for me right now for refactoring, but I feel like it should be a permanent thing, not a setting - or it should default to on and people should turn it off, but who would ever do that? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Consider a `strict_templates` setting 1618249044 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1