issue_comments
1 row where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 1884408624 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Move schema tables from _internal to _catalog · 1 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1708777964 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2177#issuecomment-1708777964 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2177 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5l2eHs | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-06T17:04:30Z | 2023-09-06T17:04:30Z | OWNER | Here's the thinking: setting the You might run more than one instance at once (I often have 4 or 5 going). This would currently break, because they would over-write each other's catalog tables: The breaking wouldn't be obvious because the catalog tables aren't used by any features yet, but it's still bad. This convinced us that actually we should move those I think we move them to an in-memory So each instance of Datasette gets its own truly private An interesting thing that came up about a shared |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Move schema tables from _internal to _catalog 1884408624 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1