issue_comments
10 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 472115381 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- extracts= should support multiple-column extracts · 10 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
710461468 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-710461468 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMDQ2MTQ2OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-16T19:18:19Z | 2020-10-16T19:18:19Z | OWNER | Reconsidering: #89 was a feature request that relates to this, so maybe this is worth implementing after all. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 | |
710397574 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-710397574 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMDM5NzU3NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-16T18:38:21Z | 2020-10-16T18:38:21Z | OWNER | I'm not going to implement this. I'll leave |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 | |
710395444 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-710395444 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMDM5NTQ0NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-16T18:37:10Z | 2020-10-16T18:37:10Z | OWNER | But this begins to feel too complicated, given that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 | |
710393550 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-710393550 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMDM5MzU1MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-16T18:35:57Z | 2020-10-16T18:36:39Z | OWNER | If I want to support that most complicated example, I think the option to pass a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 | |
710390915 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-710390915 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMDM5MDkxNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-16T18:34:26Z | 2020-10-16T18:34:50Z | OWNER | Here's the most complex example of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 | |
710364942 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-710364942 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMDM2NDk0Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-16T18:18:48Z | 2020-10-16T18:18:48Z | OWNER | I think there is. It's a nice existing feature, and I don't think adding tuple support to it would be a huge lift. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 | |
710363789 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-710363789 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMDM2Mzc4OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-16T18:18:05Z | 2020-10-16T18:18:05Z | OWNER | I wonder if there's value in extending the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 | |
710359724 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-710359724 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMDM1OTcyNA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-16T18:15:31Z | 2020-10-16T18:15:31Z | OWNER | Using a tuple would work:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 | |
710346830 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-710346830 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMDM0NjgzMA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-16T18:08:52Z | 2020-10-16T18:09:21Z | OWNER | The new |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 | |
514509307 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49#issuecomment-514509307 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNDUwOTMwNw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-07-24T07:09:43Z | 2019-07-24T07:10:21Z | OWNER | This syntax should be shared with #42 as much as possible. Maybe something based on a namedtuple would work, since those are already used in the library.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
extracts= should support multiple-column extracts 472115381 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1