issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and issue = 773913793 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Modernize code to Python 3.6+ · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
750390741 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1158#issuecomment-750390741 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1158 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MDM5MDc0MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-23T17:05:32Z | 2020-12-23T17:05:32Z | OWNER | Thanks for this! I'm fine keeping the |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Modernize code to Python 3.6+ 773913793 | |
750373603 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1158#issuecomment-750373603 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1158 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MDM3MzYwMw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-23T16:26:21Z | 2020-12-23T16:26:21Z | OWNER | Did you use a tool to find these or are they all from manual code inspection? They look good - I particularly like the set/dict literals. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Modernize code to Python 3.6+ 773913793 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1