issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 828858421 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • simonw · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • Allow canned query params to specify default values · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • OWNER · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
808651088 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1258#issuecomment-808651088 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1258 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwODY1MTA4OA== simonw 9599 2021-03-27T04:41:52Z 2021-03-27T04:42:14Z OWNER

Right now they look like this: yaml databases: fixtures: queries: neighborhood_search: params: - text In addition to being able to specify defaults, I'd also like to add other things in the future - most significantly the ability to specify a different input widget (e.g. textarea v.s. single-line input)

So maybe this looks like: yaml params: - name: text default: "" - name: age widget: number

 
{
    "total_count": 3,
    "+1": 3,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow canned query params to specify default values 828858421  
808650266 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1258#issuecomment-808650266 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1258 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwODY1MDI2Ng== simonw 9599 2021-03-27T04:37:07Z 2021-03-27T04:37:07Z OWNER

I like that idea.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow canned query params to specify default values 828858421  
803471702 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1258#issuecomment-803471702 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1258 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMzQ3MTcwMg== simonw 9599 2021-03-20T22:19:39Z 2021-03-20T22:19:39Z OWNER

This is a good idea. I avoided this initially because it should be possible to run a canned query with a parameter set to the empty string, but that view could definitely be smart enough to differentiate between ?sql=...&param= and ?sql= with no param specified at all.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow canned query params to specify default values 828858421  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);