issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 1124731464 and user = 25778 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Make it easier to insert geometries, with documentation and maybe code · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1077671779 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1077671779 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5AO_dj | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-03-24T14:11:33Z | 2022-03-24T14:11:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Coming back to this. I was about to add a utility function to datasette-geojson to convert lat/lng columns to geometries. Thankfully I googled first. There's a SpatiaLite function for this: MakePoint.
I'm not sure if that would work with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Make it easier to insert geometries, with documentation and maybe code 1124731464 | |
1030741289 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1030741289 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM49b90p | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-02-06T03:03:43Z | 2022-02-06T03:03:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Off the top of my head:
Some of this is easy enough with SQL functions, some is easier in Python. Maybe that's where having pre-built classes gets really handy, because it saves you from thinking about which way it's implemented. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Make it easier to insert geometries, with documentation and maybe code 1124731464 | |
1030740826 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1030740826 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM49b9ta | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-02-06T02:59:10Z | 2022-02-06T02:59:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | All this said, I don't think it's unreasonable to point people to dedicated tools like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Make it easier to insert geometries, with documentation and maybe code 1124731464 | |
1030740653 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1030740653 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM49b9qt | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-02-06T02:57:17Z | 2022-02-06T02:57:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I like the idea of having stock conversions you could import. I'd actually move them to a dedicated module (call it ```python from sqlite_utils.conversions import LongitudeLatitude db["places"].insert( { "name": "London", "lng": -0.118092, "lat": 51.509865, }, conversions={"point": LongitudeLatitude("lng", "lat")}, ) ``` I would definitely use that for every CSV I get with lat/lng columns where I actually need GeoJSON. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Make it easier to insert geometries, with documentation and maybe code 1124731464 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1