issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 1886771493 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- `table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1712895580 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1712895580 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5mGLZc | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-10T17:46:41Z | 2023-09-10T17:46:41Z | OWNER | In working on this I learned that https://www.sqlite.org/lang_vacuum.html#how_vacuum_works
So this fix wasn't as valuable as I thought. I need to move away from ever assuming that a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 | |
| 1710935270 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710935270 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-szm | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:55:30Z | 2023-09-08T00:55:30Z | OWNER | Yes! That recreated the bug: ```
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 | |
| 1710934448 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710934448 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-smw | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:54:03Z | 2023-09-08T00:54:03Z | OWNER | Oh! Maybe the row ID preservation here is a coincidence because the tables are created from scratch and count 1, 2, 3. If I delete a row from the table and then insert some more - breaking the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 | |
| 1710933716 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710933716 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-sbU | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:52:42Z | 2023-09-08T00:52:42Z | OWNER | I just noticed that the table where I encountered this bug wasn't actually a The reason the But I tried this test and it passed, too:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 | |
| 1710931605 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710931605 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-r6V | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:49:02Z | 2023-09-08T00:49:02Z | OWNER | I tried bumping that up to 10,000 rows instead of just 3 but the test still passed. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 | |
| 1710930934 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710930934 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-rv2 | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:47:57Z | 2023-09-08T00:47:57Z | OWNER | That's odd, I wrote a test for this just now and it passes already:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1