issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 507454958 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Handle really wide tables better · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1238790634 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-1238790634 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5J1nHq | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-07T00:55:52Z | 2022-09-07T00:58:41Z | OWNER | Or there's this recipe on StackOverflow that does the same thing without jQuery - there's an interactive demo on that page if you click "Run code snippet": https://stackoverflow.com/a/47038108/6083 All sorts of other potential solutions in that thread too. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle really wide tables better 507454958 | |
1238790158 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-1238790158 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5J1nAO | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-07T00:54:55Z | 2022-09-07T00:54:55Z | OWNER | The jqDoubleScroll plugin is interesting: https://github.com/avianey/jqDoubleScroll/blob/master/jquery.doubleScroll.js Here's a demo: https://6317eba21040d42c0228aab9--tiny-tarsier-c1f294.netlify.app/example.html Wouldn't be too hard to port that to work without jQuery. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle really wide tables better 507454958 | |
1238383171 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-1238383171 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5J0DpD | CharlesNepote 562352 | 2022-09-06T16:27:25Z | 2022-09-06T16:27:25Z | NONE | Perhaps some ways to address this.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle really wide tables better 507454958 | |
720741903 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-720741903 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMDc0MTkwMw== | terrycojones 132978 | 2020-11-02T21:44:45Z | 2020-11-02T21:44:45Z | NONE | Hi & thanks for the note @simonw! I wish I had more time to play with (and contribute to) datasette. I know you don't need me to tell you that it's super cool :-) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle really wide tables better 507454958 | |
720689653 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-720689653 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMDY4OTY1Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-02T19:53:36Z | 2020-11-02T19:53:47Z | OWNER | In #998 I implemented a horizontal scrollbar for these tables, which is a big improvement - demo here: https://global-power-plants.datasettes.com/global-power-plants/global-power-plants |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle really wide tables better 507454958 | |
647893140 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-647893140 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Nzg5MzE0MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-23T03:59:51Z | 2020-06-23T03:59:51Z | OWNER | Related: #862 - a time limit on the total time spent considering suggested facets for a table. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle really wide tables better 507454958 | |
567226048 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-567226048 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2NzIyNjA0OA== | terrycojones 132978 | 2019-12-18T21:43:13Z | 2019-12-18T21:43:13Z | NONE | Meant to add that of course it would be better not to reinvent CSS (one time was already enough). But one option would be to provide a mechanism to specify a CSS class for a column (a cell, a row...) and let the user give a URL path to a CSS file on the command line. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle really wide tables better 507454958 | |
567225156 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-567225156 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2NzIyNTE1Ng== | terrycojones 132978 | 2019-12-18T21:40:35Z | 2019-12-18T21:40:35Z | NONE | I initially went looking for a way to hide a column completely. Today I found the setting to truncate cells, but it applies to all cells. In my case I have text columns that can have many thousands of characters. I was wondering whether the metadata JSON would be an appropriate place to indicate how columns are displayed (on a col-by-col basis). E.g., I'd like to be able to specify that only 20 chars of a given column be shown, and the font be monospace. But maybe I can do that in some other way - I barely know anything about datasette yet, sorry! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle really wide tables better 507454958 | |
542462126 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-542462126 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MjQ2MjEyNg== | simonw 9599 | 2019-10-16T00:45:45Z | 2019-10-16T00:45:45Z | OWNER | This means moving away from |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle really wide tables better 507454958 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3