issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 521323012 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Support Python 3.8, stop supporting Python 3.5 · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
609393513 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/627#issuecomment-609393513 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/627 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwOTM5MzUxMw== | stonebig 4312421 | 2020-04-05T10:23:57Z | 2020-04-05T10:23:57Z | NONE | is there any specific reason to stick to Jinja2~=2.10.3 when there is Jinja-2.11.1 ? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support Python 3.8, stop supporting Python 3.5 521323012 | |
552737357 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/627#issuecomment-552737357 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/627 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MjczNzM1Nw== | willingc 2680980 | 2019-11-12T05:13:46Z | 2019-11-12T05:13:46Z | NONE | Thanks @simonw. I appreciate your work on this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support Python 3.8, stop supporting Python 3.5 521323012 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2