issue_comments

Table actions

9 rows where issue = 648421105 sorted by updated_at descending

✖
✖

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

author_association 2

issue 1

  • Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? · 9 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
692967733 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-692967733 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5Mjk2NzczMw== simonw 9599 2020-09-15T20:42:04Z 2020-09-15T20:42:04Z OWNER

I'm not going to drop CSRF protection - it's still needed for older browsers - but I have relaxed the circumstances under which it is applied. It only applies to requests that include cookies for example, so API clients that don't send cookies don't need to worry about it.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105  
652597975 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652597975 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjU5Nzk3NQ== simonw 9599 2020-07-01T19:12:15Z 2020-07-01T19:12:15Z OWNER

The latest release of https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens (0.2) now supports SQL configuration of tokens.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105  
652520496 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652520496 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjUyMDQ5Ng== simonw 9599 2020-07-01T16:26:52Z 2020-07-01T16:26:52Z OWNER

Tokens get verified by plugins. So far there's only one: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens - which has you hard-coding plugins in a configuration file. I have a issue there to add support for database-backed tokens too: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens/issues/1

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105  
652255960 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652255960 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjI1NTk2MA== abdusco 3243482 2020-07-01T07:52:25Z 2020-07-01T08:10:00Z CONTRIBUTOR

I am calling the API from another origin, so injecting CSRF token into templates wouldn't work.

EDIT:

I'll try the new version, it sounds promising

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105  
652261382 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652261382 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjI2MTM4Mg== abdusco 3243482 2020-07-01T08:03:17Z 2020-07-01T08:03:23Z CONTRIBUTOR

Bearer tokens sound interesting. Where do tokens come from? An auth provider of my choosing? How do they get verified?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105  
652182990 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652182990 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjE4Mjk5MA== simonw 9599 2020-07-01T04:29:38Z 2020-07-01T04:42:59Z OWNER

Have you tried the method described here? https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/internals.html#csrf-protection - I'm happy to bulk out that section of the documentation if that doesn't help solve your problem.

I just closed #835 which should make CSRF protection easier to work with - it won't interfere with requests without cookies or requests with Authentication: Bearer token tokens. See also https://github.com/simonw/asgi-csrf/issues/11

You can try out pip install datasette==0.45a5 to get those features. Hopefully releasing a full 0.45 tomorrow.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105  
652166115 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652166115 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjE2NjExNQ== abdusco 3243482 2020-07-01T03:28:07Z 2020-07-01T03:28:07Z CONTRIBUTOR

Does this mean custom routes get to expose endpoints accepting POST requests? I've tried earlier to add some POST endpoints, but requests were being rejected by Datasette due to CSRF

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105  
651984989 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-651984989 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk4NDk4OQ== simonw 9599 2020-06-30T19:03:25Z 2020-06-30T19:03:25Z OWNER

Relevant: #835

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105  
651984355 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-651984355 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk4NDM1NQ== simonw 9599 2020-06-30T19:02:15Z 2020-06-30T19:02:15Z OWNER

https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html#login-csrf

Login CSRF can be mitigated by creating pre-sessions (sessions before a user is authenticated) and including tokens in login form.

Sounds like regular CSRF protection to me.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);