issue_comments
8 rows where issue = 691521965 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date)
issue 1
- Mechanism for defining custom display of results · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
686767208 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9#issuecomment-686767208 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4Njc2NzIwOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-03T21:12:14Z | 2020-09-03T21:12:14Z | MEMBER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for defining custom display of results 691521965 | ||
686689122 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9#issuecomment-686689122 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4NjY4OTEyMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-03T18:43:20Z | 2020-09-03T18:43:20Z | MEMBER | Needs documentation. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for defining custom display of results 691521965 | |
686688963 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9#issuecomment-686688963 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4NjY4ODk2Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-03T18:42:59Z | 2020-09-03T18:42:59Z | MEMBER | I'm pleased with how this works now. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for defining custom display of results 691521965 | |
686163754 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9#issuecomment-686163754 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4NjE2Mzc1NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-03T00:46:21Z | 2020-09-03T00:46:21Z | MEMBER | Challenge: the Let's say it can either be duplicated in the
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for defining custom display of results 691521965 | |
686158454 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9#issuecomment-686158454 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4NjE1ODQ1NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-03T00:32:42Z | 2020-09-03T00:32:42Z | MEMBER | If this turns out to be too inefficient I could add a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for defining custom display of results 691521965 | |
686154627 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9#issuecomment-686154627 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4NjE1NDYyNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-03T00:19:22Z | 2020-09-03T00:19:22Z | MEMBER | If this performs well enough (100 displayed items will be 100 extra |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for defining custom display of results 691521965 | |
686154486 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9#issuecomment-686154486 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4NjE1NDQ4Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-03T00:18:54Z | 2020-09-03T00:18:54Z | MEMBER |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for defining custom display of results 691521965 | |
686153967 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9#issuecomment-686153967 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/9 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4NjE1Mzk2Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-03T00:17:16Z | 2020-09-03T00:17:55Z | MEMBER | Maybe I can take advantage of https://sqlite.org/np1queryprob.html here - I could define a SQL query for fetching the "display" version of each item, and include a Jinja template fragment in the configuration as well. Maybe something like this:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for defining custom display of results 691521965 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1