issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 753668177 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- GENERATED column support · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
736030599 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1116#issuecomment-736030599 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNjAzMDU5OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T20:41:41Z | 2020-11-30T20:41:41Z | OWNER | Here's the problem: https://www.sqlite.org/changes.html#version_3_26_0
CI is running 3.22.0. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
GENERATED column support 753668177 | |
736015487 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1116#issuecomment-736015487 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNjAxNTQ4Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T20:11:07Z | 2020-11-30T20:11:07Z | OWNER | Working on this in a pull request: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1117 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
GENERATED column support 753668177 | |
736014372 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1116#issuecomment-736014372 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNjAxNDM3Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T20:08:48Z | 2020-11-30T20:08:48Z | OWNER | Ouch, the tests pass on my laptop but failed in CI: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/392367997 Lots of failures look like this:
I wonder why it didn't fail on my laptop? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
GENERATED column support 753668177 | |
736010720 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1116#issuecomment-736010720 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNjAxMDcyMA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T20:01:53Z | 2020-11-30T20:01:53Z | OWNER | I'm OK exposing hidden columns, unless someone comes up with a pressing reason not to. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
GENERATED column support 753668177 | |
736005833 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1116#issuecomment-736005833 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNjAwNTgzMw== | nattaylor 2789593 | 2020-11-30T19:54:39Z | 2020-11-30T19:54:39Z | NONE | @simonw thanks for investigating so quickly. If it is undesirable to change that hidden behavior, maybe something like this is a suitable workaround:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
GENERATED column support 753668177 | |
736004383 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1116#issuecomment-736004383 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNjAwNDM4Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T19:51:51Z | 2020-11-30T19:51:51Z | OWNER | This change will also have an impact on how hidden virtual FTS tables are displayed, since apparently those have some hidden columns: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures?sql=select+*+from+pragma_table_xinfo%28%27searchable_fts%27%29 | cid | name | type | notnull | dflt_value | pk | hidden | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 0 | text1 | | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 1 | text2 | | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 2 | name with . and spaces | | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 3 | searchable_fts | | 0 | | 0 | 1 | | 4 | docid | | 0 | | 0 | 1 | | 5 | __langid | | 0 | | 0 | 1 | |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
GENERATED column support 753668177 | |
735995695 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1116#issuecomment-735995695 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTk5NTY5NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T19:34:15Z | 2020-11-30T19:34:15Z | OWNER | Generated column support was added in SQLite 3.31.0, so any unit tests I write for this should use skipIf to only run on that version or later. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
GENERATED column support 753668177 | |
735993935 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1116#issuecomment-735993935 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTk5MzkzNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T19:30:44Z | 2020-11-30T19:32:15Z | OWNER | It looks like But Compare https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures?sql=select++from+pragma_table_info%28%27searchable%27%29 to https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures?sql=select++from+pragma_table_xinfo%28%27searchable%27%29 - the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
GENERATED column support 753668177 | |
735992106 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1116#issuecomment-735992106 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTk5MjEwNg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T19:27:10Z | 2020-11-30T19:27:10Z | OWNER | I'm treating this as a bug - these columns should definitely be visible in Datasette. I created my own test database using SQLite from Homebrew like this:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
GENERATED column support 753668177 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2