issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where user = 173848 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • yozlet · 4 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
1728192688 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2189#issuecomment-1728192688 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2189 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5nAiCw yozlet 173848 2023-09-20T17:53:31Z 2023-09-20T17:53:31Z NONE

/me munches popcorn at a furious rate, utterly entralled

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Server hang on parallel execution of queries to named in-memory databases 1901416155  
753218817 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753218817 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxODgxNw== yozlet 173848 2020-12-31T22:32:25Z 2020-12-31T22:32:25Z NONE

Amazing work! And you've put in far more work than I'd expect to reduce the payload (which is admirable).

So, to add a plugin with the current design, it goes in (a) the template or (b) a bookmarklet, right?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  
706413753 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-706413753 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjQxMzc1Mw== yozlet 173848 2020-10-09T21:41:12Z 2020-10-09T21:41:12Z NONE

If you don't mind a somewhat bonkers idea: how about a JS client-side plugin capability that allows any user looking at a Datasette site to pull in external plugins for data manipulation, even if the Datasette owner hasn't added them? (Yes, this may be much too ambitious. If you're remotely interested, maybe fork this discussion to a different issue.)

This is some fascinating reading about what JS sandboxing looks like these days: https://www.figma.com/blog/how-we-built-the-figma-plugin-system/

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  
356161672 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/176#issuecomment-356161672 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/176 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1NjE2MTY3Mg== yozlet 173848 2018-01-09T02:35:35Z 2018-01-09T02:35:35Z NONE

@wulfmann I think I disagree, except I'm not entirely sure what you mean by that first paragraph. The JSON API that Datasette currently exposes is quite different to GraphQL.

Furthermore, there's no "just" about connecting micro-graphql to a DB; at least, no more "just" than adding any other API. You still need to configure the schema, which is exactly the kind of thing that Datasette does for JSON API. This is why I think that GraphQL's a good fit here.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Add GraphQL endpoint 285168503  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);