id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
808771690,MDU6SXNzdWU4MDg3NzE2OTA=,1225,More flexible formatting of records with CSS grid,649467,open,0,,,0,2021-02-15T19:28:17Z,2021-02-15T19:28:35Z,,NONE,,"In several applications I've been experimenting with alternate formatting of datasette query results. Lately I've found that CSS grids work very well and seem quite general for formatting rows. In CSS I use grid templates to define the layout of each record and the regions for each field, hiding the fields I don't want. It's pretty flexible and looks good. It's also a great basis for highly responsive layout.

I initially thought I'd only use this feature for record detail views, but now I use it for index views as well. 

However, there are some limitations:
* With the existing table templates, it seems that you can change the `display` property on the enclosing `table`, `tbody`, and `tr` to make them be grid-like, but that seems hacky (convert `table` and `tbody` to be `display: block` and `tr` to be `display: grid`).
* More significantly, it's very nice to have the column name available when rendering each record to display headers/field labels. The existing templates don't do that, so a custom `_table` template is necessary.
* I don't know if any plugins are sensitive to whether data is rendered as a table or not since I'm not completely clear how plugins get their data. 
* Regardless, you need custom CSS to take full advantage of grids. I don't have a proposal on how to integrate them more deeply.

It would be helpful to at least have an official example or test that used a grid layout for records to make sure nothing in datasette breaks with it. ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1225/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
718521469,MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg1MjE0Njk=,1011,column name links broken in 0.50.1,649467,closed,0,,,4,2020-10-10T03:37:51Z,2020-10-10T04:09:32Z,2020-10-10T03:52:07Z,NONE,,"I just upgraded from 0.49 to 0.50.1 and found that the links on column headers are broken. 

If I inspect the source, they have a leading ""//"" (without host or port) rather than including base_url like other links on the page do. The links in the ""gears"" menu for each column do work.

 I don't have custom templates for my project. 
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1011/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
718238967,MDU6SXNzdWU3MTgyMzg5Njc=,1003,from_json jinja2 filter,649467,open,0,,,4,2020-10-09T15:30:58Z,2020-10-09T17:17:07Z,,NONE,,"When JSON fields are rendered in a jinja2 template, it is handy to be able to manipulate them as data (e.g., iterate over an array of values). 

Ansible has a ""from_json"" function, which just called json.loads. It's a trivial as a datasette plugin, but it seems generally useful. Does it makes sense to add it directly into the app?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1003/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
699947574,MDU6SXNzdWU2OTk5NDc1NzQ=,963,Currently selected array facets are not correctly persisted through hidden form fields,649467,closed,0,,5818042,1,2020-09-12T01:49:17Z,2020-09-12T21:54:29Z,2020-09-12T21:54:09Z,NONE,,"Faceted search uses JSON array elements as facets rather than the arrays. However, if a search is ""Apply""ed (using the Apply button), the array itself rather than its elements used. 

To reproduce:
https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_sort=pk&_facet=created&_facet=tags&_facet_array=tags

Press ""Apply"", which might be done when removing a filter. Notice that the ""tags"" facet values are now arrays, not array elements. It appears the ""&_facet_array=tags"" element of the query string is dropped.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/963/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
276091279,MDU6SXNzdWUyNzYwOTEyNzk=,144,apsw as alternative sqlite3 binding (for full text search),649467,closed,0,,,3,2017-11-22T14:40:39Z,2018-05-28T21:29:42Z,2018-05-28T21:29:42Z,NONE,,"Hey there,

Have you considered providing apsw support as an alternative to stock python sqlite3?  I use apsw because it keeps up with sqlite3 and is straightforward to bring in extensions like FTS5.  FTS really accelerates the kind of searching often done by web clients.

I may be able to help (it shouldn't be much code), but there are a couple of stylistic questions that come up when supporting an optional package.  Also, apsw is tricky in that it doesn't have a pypi package (author says limitations in providing options to setup.py). ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/144/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed