id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
609950090,MDU6SXNzdWU2MDk5NTAwOTA=,33,Fall back to authentication via ENV,2029,closed,0,,,4,2020-04-30T12:58:14Z,2020-05-02T18:46:10Z,2020-05-02T18:45:37Z,NONE,,"Would you accept a PR that falls back to looking for an environment variable for the GitHub token? Specifically a change here:
https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/blob/c34d5a18bfc41fa08755ba3d5cf9fe09ff204238/github_to_sqlite/cli.py#L271

I'd like to use `github-to-sqlite` in a GitHub Action workflow and this would be simpler than trying to fill out the prompt or generate a file with sensitive content.

Wanted to check first, I'm happy to submit a PR with tests and updates to the docs. ",207052882,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/33/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
544571092,MDU6SXNzdWU1NDQ1NzEwOTI=,15,Assets table with downloads,2029,closed,0,,5225818,4,2020-01-02T13:05:28Z,2020-03-28T12:17:01Z,2020-03-23T19:17:32Z,NONE,,"The `releases` command extracts the releases table, but data about the individual assets are locked up in the JSON document in the `assets` field. My main interest is in individual and aggregate download counts. I was wondering if creating a new table with a record per asset may be useful?
If so I'm happy to send a PR when I get a moment. Do you have opinions about that simply being part of the `releases` command or would you prefer a separate command as well?",207052882,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/15/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed