id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
681575714,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDY5OTQ0OTk5,49,"Document the use of --stop_after with favorites, refs #20",370930,closed,0,,,1,2020-08-19T06:10:52Z,2021-08-20T00:02:11Z,2021-08-20T00:02:11Z,CONTRIBUTOR,dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/pulls/49,(I discovered this trawling the issues for how to use --since with favorites),206156866,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/49/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
698791218,MDU6SXNzdWU2OTg3OTEyMTg=,50,"favorites --stop_after=N stops after min(N, 200)",370930,open,0,,,2,2020-09-11T03:38:14Z,2020-09-13T05:11:14Z,,CONTRIBUTOR,,"For any number greater than 200, `favorites --stop_after` stops after getting 200 tweets, e.g.
```
$ twitter-to-sqlite favorites tweets.db --stop_after=300
Importing favorites  [####################################]  199
$
```
I don't _think_ this is a limitation of the API (if you omit `--stop_after` you get some very large number, possibly all of them), so I _think_ this is a bug.",206156866,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/50/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,