issues

Table actions

5 rows where repo = 107914493 and user = 12617395 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)

state 2

type 1

repo 1

  • datasette · 5 ✖
id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at ▲ closed_at author_association pull_request body repo type active_lock_reason performed_via_github_app reactions draft state_reason
340396247 MDU6SXNzdWUzNDAzOTYyNDc= 339 Expose SANIC_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT config option in a sensible way bsilverm 12617395 closed 0     4 2018-07-11T20:38:06Z 2022-03-21T22:22:40Z 2022-03-21T22:22:34Z NONE  

Is it possible to configure the sql_time_limit_ms beyond 60 seconds? It seems queries are still timing out at 60 seconds when sql_time_limit_ms is set to 180000. We have a very large data set and often encounter timeouts when testing new queries from the datasette UI. We are optimizing our database as much as we can, but still may require more than 60 seconds for complex queries.

 datasette 107914493 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/339/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   completed
510076368 MDU6SXNzdWU1MTAwNzYzNjg= 605 Support queries at the table level bsilverm 12617395 open 0     2 2019-10-21T15:58:30Z 2019-10-30T18:55:37Z   NONE  

Per the issue described in issue #588, it was determined queries are not supported at the table level. Per my last comment in the issue, I'd like to request support for this as it would help eliminate errors in the event certain tables are not present in the database.

 datasette 107914493 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/605/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    
505512251 MDU6SXNzdWU1MDU1MTIyNTE= 588 Queries per DB table in metadata.json bsilverm 12617395 closed 0     3 2019-10-10T21:08:19Z 2019-10-21T12:58:22Z 2019-10-21T01:48:42Z NONE  

It doesn't appear possible to have separate queries defined per database table. When I do something like below, my table descriptions show up but not the queries:

"databases": { "MYDB": { "tables": { "MYFIRSTTABLE": { "source": "Test", "source_url": "https://www.google.com", "queries": { "Query 1": { "sql": "select * from MYFIRSTTABLE", "title": "Query 1", "description": "This is the first query" }, } }, "MYSECONDTABLE": { "source":"Test2", "source_url":"https://www.google.com", "queries": { "Query 2" : { "sql":"select * from MYSECONDTABLE;", "title": "Query 2", "description":"This is the second query" } } } }

 datasette 107914493 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/588/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   completed
341123355 MDU6SXNzdWUzNDExMjMzNTU= 342 Requesting support for query description bsilverm 12617395 closed 0     4 2018-07-13T18:50:16Z 2018-07-24T04:53:21Z 2018-07-16T02:33:54Z NONE  

It would be great if the metadata file allowed you to enter a description for the query. We have a lot of pre-defined queries that can only be so descriptive by their name. It would be nice if an optional description could be included underneath the name within the UI, or on hover where it currently shows the SQL.

 datasette 107914493 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/342/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   completed
334190959 MDU6SXNzdWUzMzQxOTA5NTk= 321 Wildcard support in query parameters bsilverm 12617395 closed 0   0.23.1 3439337 8 2018-06-20T18:03:56Z 2018-06-21T17:00:10Z 2018-06-21T04:55:26Z NONE  

I haven't found a way to get the wildcard (%) inserted automatically in to a query parameter. This would be useful for cases the query parameter is followed by a LIKE clause. Wrapping the parameter name using the wildcard character within the metadata file (ie - ...where xyz like %:querystring%) does not seem to work. Can this be made possible? Or if not, can the template be extended to provide a tip to the user that they need to insert the wildcard characters themselves?

 datasette 107914493 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/321/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   completed

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issues] (
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [number] INTEGER,
   [title] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [state] TEXT,
   [locked] INTEGER,
   [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
   [comments] INTEGER,
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [closed_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [pull_request] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [type] TEXT
, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
                ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
                ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
                ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
                ON [issues] ([user]);