issues
2 rows where repo = 107914493 and user = 295329 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
810507413 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTc1MTg3NDU3 | 1229 | ensure immutable databses when starting in configuration directory mode with | camallen 295329 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2021-02-17T20:18:26Z | 2022-04-22T13:16:36Z | 2021-03-29T00:17:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/1229 | fixes #1224 This PR ensures all databases found in a configuration directory that match the files in specifically on building the And correctly builds the immutable database list from the Note for this to work the I couldn't find an easy way to test this due to the way I've updated the relevant docs as well, i.e. use the |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1229/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
807433181 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MDc0MzMxODE= | 1224 | can't start immutable databases from configuration dir mode | camallen 295329 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2021-02-12T17:50:13Z | 2021-03-29T00:17:31Z | 2021-03-29T00:17:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Say I have a If I start datasette via I don't want to have to list out the databases by name, e.g. According to the docs outlined in https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/settings.html?highlight=immutable#configuration-directory-mode this should be possible
I believe that if the However it appears the Click Multiple Options will return a tuple via https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/9603d893b9b72653895318c9104d754229fdb146/datasette/cli.py#L311-L317 The resulting tuple is passed to the Datasette app via If you think this is a bug and needs fixing, I am willing to make a PR to check for the empty Thoughts? Also - i'm loving Datasette, it truly is a wonderful tool, thank you :) |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1224/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);