issues
5 rows where repo = 303218369, state = "closed" and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
978743426 | MDU6SXNzdWU5Nzg3NDM0MjY= | 13 | xml.etree.ElementTree.ParseError: not well-formed (invalid token) | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2021-08-25T05:48:21Z | 2021-08-26T18:45:13Z | 2021-08-26T18:45:13Z | MEMBER | Got this error today:
|
evernote-to-sqlite 303218369 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/evernote-to-sqlite/issues/13/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
718949182 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg5NDkxODI= | 6 | Better handling of OCR data | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2020-10-11T23:20:52Z | 2020-10-12T00:04:10Z | 2020-10-12T00:04:10Z | MEMBER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/dogsheep/evernote-to-sqlite/issues/4#issuecomment-706784028 |
evernote-to-sqlite 303218369 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/evernote-to-sqlite/issues/6/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
718938508 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg5Mzg1MDg= | 4 | Configure FTS + add an index on the date columns | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2020-10-11T22:14:40Z | 2020-10-11T23:41:29Z | 2020-10-11T23:41:29Z | MEMBER | Sort by date descending is likely the most common way of sorting, so that column should be indexed. Also add FTS configuration for both notes and the OCR column on resources. |
evernote-to-sqlite 303218369 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/evernote-to-sqlite/issues/4/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
718938321 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg5MzgzMjE= | 3 | Use a content hash for the note IDs | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2020-10-11T22:13:46Z | 2020-10-11T23:15:04Z | 2020-10-11T23:15:04Z | MEMBER | Without a GUID note IDs are pretty ineffective, but using a hash of the contents will at least avoid creating identical duplicates in the future. |
evernote-to-sqlite 303218369 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/evernote-to-sqlite/issues/3/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
718938046 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg5MzgwNDY= | 2 | Convert dates to a better format | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2020-10-11T22:12:33Z | 2020-10-11T23:15:03Z | 2020-10-11T23:15:03Z | MEMBER | evernote-to-sqlite 303218369 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/evernote-to-sqlite/issues/2/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);