issues
5 rows where repo = 611552758, state = "open" and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1617602868 | I_kwDOJHON9s5gaqk0 | 6 | Character encoding problem | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2023-03-09T16:44:34Z | 2023-04-14T15:22:09Z | MEMBER | I ran against a recent note with this in it:
And got back:
Pasting that into https://ftfy.vercel.app/?s=Actions+%E2%80%9A%C3%B6%C3%B4%C3%94%E2%88%8F%C3%A8+ gives this:
|
apple-notes-to-sqlite 611552758 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/apple-notes-to-sqlite/issues/6/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1618130434 | I_kwDOJHON9s5gcrYC | 11 | Implement a SQL view to make it easier to query files in a nested folder | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2023-03-09T23:19:28Z | 2023-03-09T23:24:01Z | MEMBER | Working with nested data in SQL is tricky, can I make it easier with a view or canned query? |
apple-notes-to-sqlite 611552758 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/apple-notes-to-sqlite/issues/11/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1617938730 | I_kwDOJHON9s5gb8kq | 9 | Default to just storing plaintext, store HTML if `--html` is passed | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-03-09T20:19:06Z | 2023-03-09T20:19:06Z | MEMBER | The full I'm tempted to say you don't get HTML unless you pass a |
apple-notes-to-sqlite 611552758 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/apple-notes-to-sqlite/issues/9/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1616429236 | I_kwDOJHON9s5gWMC0 | 4 | Support incremental updates | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2023-03-09T05:14:00Z | 2023-03-09T18:20:56Z | MEMBER | Running this script can take several hours against a large notes database. Would be neat if it could run against just the notes that have been modified since it last ran. Could pull the max Problem is I don't actually know what order it iterates over the notes in. |
apple-notes-to-sqlite 611552758 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/apple-notes-to-sqlite/issues/4/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1616440856 | I_kwDOJHON9s5gWO4Y | 5 | Configure full text search | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-03-09T05:20:46Z | 2023-03-09T05:20:46Z | MEMBER | FTS would be useful. Maybe even extract the plain text from the notes to make that index easier to create, rather than creating it against the HTML. Can use the |
apple-notes-to-sqlite 611552758 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/apple-notes-to-sqlite/issues/5/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);