issues
7 rows where state = "open", type = "issue" and user = 25778 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1469821027 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xm7Bj | 1921 | Document methods to get canned queries | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-11-30T15:26:33Z | 2022-11-30T23:34:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Two methods will get canned queries for a Datasette instance:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1921/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1469796454 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xm1Bm | 1920 | Document Datasette.metadata() method | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-11-30T15:10:36Z | 2022-11-30T15:10:36Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Code is here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/datasette/app.py#L503 This will be the official way to access metadata from plugins. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1920/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1108671952 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5CFP3Q | 1605 | Scripted exports | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 10 | 2022-01-19T23:45:55Z | 2022-11-30T15:06:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Posting this while I'm thinking about it: I mentioned at the end of this thread that I'm usually doing I used to use a tool called datafreeze to do scripted exports, but that project looks dead now. The ergonomics of it are pretty nice, though, and the This is related to the idea for |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1605/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1439009231 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VxYnP | 1884 | Exclude virtual tables from datasette inspect | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 6 | 2022-11-07T21:26:01Z | 2022-11-21T04:40:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ran
It still worked, but probably want to catch this. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1884/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1193090967 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HHR-X | 1699 | Proposal: datasette query | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 6 | 2022-04-05T12:36:43Z | 2022-04-11T01:32:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I started sketching out a plugin to add a At its most basic, it will write the results of a query to STDOUT.
This isn't much improvement over using sqlite-utils. To make better use of datasette and its ecosystem, run For example, using the metadata file from alltheplaces-datasette:
That query would be good to get as CSV, and we can auto-discover metadata and databases in the current directory:
In this case, If a query takes parameters, I can pass them in at runtime, using the
I'm very interested in feedback on this, including whether it should be a plugin or in Datasette core. (I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I'm prototyping it as a plugin to start.) |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1160034488 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5FJLi4 | 411 | Support for generated columns | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 8 | 2022-03-04T20:41:33Z | 2022-03-11T22:32:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This is a fairly new feature -- SQLite version 3.31.0 (2020-01-22) -- that I, admittedly, haven't gotten to work yet. But it looks incredibly useful: https://dgl.cx/2020/06/sqlite-json-support I'm not sure if this is an option on
More here: https://www.sqlite.org/gencol.html |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
817989436 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTc5ODk0MzY= | 242 | Async support | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 13 | 2021-02-27T18:29:38Z | 2021-10-28T14:37:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Following our conversation last week, want to note this here before I forget. I've had a couple situations where I'd like to do a bunch of updates in an async event loop, but I run into SQLite's issues with concurrent writes. This feels like something sqlite-utils could help with. PeeWee ORM has a SQLite write queue that might be a good model. It's using threads or gevent, but I think that approach would translate well enough to asyncio. Happy to help with this, too. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/242/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);