pull_requests
3 rows where user = 418191
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date), merged_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | state | locked | title | user | body | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | merged_at | merge_commit_sha | assignee | milestone | draft | head | base | author_association | repo | url | merged_by | auto_merge |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
216651317 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjE2NjUxMzE3 | 365 | closed | 0 | fix small doc typo | jaywgraves 418191 | 2018-09-19T14:02:02Z | 2019-12-19T02:30:33Z | 2018-09-19T17:15:43Z | 2018-09-19T17:15:43Z | 1bcd54a834a2f9730d21095df855f6708c85c200 | 0 | d3fb6a80c5878c73befa2a35e11a9ce28a6e1ab6 | b7257a21bf3dfa7353980f343c83a616da44daa7 | CONTRIBUTOR | datasette 107914493 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/365 | |||||
235194286 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjM1MTk0Mjg2 | 390 | closed | 0 | tiny typo in customization docs | jaywgraves 418191 | was looking to add some custom templates to my use of datasette and saw this small typo. | 2018-12-01T13:44:42Z | 2019-12-19T02:30:35Z | 2018-12-16T21:32:56Z | 2018-12-16T21:32:56Z | ed78922ae38b51513319b60ac39990b7c2aca810 | 0 | f8c01373dad3b8dcd10577a2e541f88ef34c77bc | 3de8fac1d322cbab6c8c55899e0e8511b36337d0 | CONTRIBUTOR | datasette 107914493 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/390 | ||||
356004242 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzU2MDA0MjQy | 653 | closed | 0 | allow leading comments in SQL input field | jaywgraves 418191 | this changes the SQL validation to allow for lines that are commented out my main use case for this is that I like to write a succession of queries when trying to solve a problem. In most native SQL clients there is a key binding that will run just the current highlighted query or the program is smart enough to run just the query that the cursor is in if it's properly delimited with a ';'. Typically my workflow will start with a single simple query and I'll copy/paste it to a new query below when I want to make big changes while debugging. This makes it easy to go back to a working version above when the query doesn't work. Since datasette sends the whole query to the DB I have to comment out the older queries by prefixing each line with `--`. This gets caught by the validators when I use my typical strategy of copy/pasting each successive query below the last one. so this is just a simple fix to allow for a query to be sent to the DB with leading comments. | 2019-12-21T14:19:52Z | 2020-02-05T02:35:41Z | 2020-02-05T02:13:25Z | 2020-02-05T02:13:25Z | 33a12c8ae526afb40a7819c9ca411c9d3c41219b | 0 | 3a4cb551b9a217d5798e3e9ad5d4b06234a81885 | d6b6c9171f3fd945c4e5e4144923ac831c43c208 | CONTRIBUTOR | datasette 107914493 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/653 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [pull_requests] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [body] TEXT, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [merged_at] TEXT, [merge_commit_sha] TEXT, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [draft] INTEGER, [head] TEXT, [base] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [url] TEXT, [merged_by] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]) , [auto_merge] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_merged_by] ON [pull_requests] ([merged_by]); CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_repo] ON [pull_requests] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_milestone] ON [pull_requests] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_assignee] ON [pull_requests] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_user] ON [pull_requests] ([user]);