issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 440134714 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Define mechanism for plugins to return structured data · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
702459432 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/446#issuecomment-702459432 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/446 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjQ1OTQzMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-02T00:08:47Z | 2020-10-02T00:08:47Z | OWNER | I've decided not to bother with this, especially having redesigned some hooks to return Datasette standard |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Define mechanism for plugins to return structured data 440134714 | |
498838841 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/446#issuecomment-498838841 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/446 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5ODgzODg0MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-06-04T20:51:37Z | 2019-06-04T20:51:37Z | OWNER | So the Python 3.7 way to do this would be dataclasses, but I still want to support 3.5. This excellent essay has made me think attrs might be the way to go: https://www.revsys.com/tidbits/dataclasses-and-attrs-when-and-why/ |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Define mechanism for plugins to return structured data 440134714 | |
489209255 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/446#issuecomment-489209255 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/446 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4OTIwOTI1NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-03T19:15:23Z | 2019-05-03T19:16:34Z | OWNER | The Alternative would be to support default values for properties of the
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Define mechanism for plugins to return structured data 440134714 | |
489204605 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/446#issuecomment-489204605 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/446 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4OTIwNDYwNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-03T18:59:51Z | 2019-05-03T18:59:59Z | OWNER | Potential design: ```python from collections import OrderedDict class DataSpec: slots = []
class Output(DataSpec): slots = ["body", "content_type", "status_code"] ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Define mechanism for plugins to return structured data 440134714 | |
489167692 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/446#issuecomment-489167692 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/446 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4OTE2NzY5Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-03T17:02:24Z | 2019-05-03T17:02:24Z | OWNER | I looked at using namedtuples for this but hey have one major constraint: there isn't a clean way to convert them to dictionary-style JSON: https://bugs.python.org/issue30343 So something that uses a class which knows how to be rendered as JSON would be a better fit. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Define mechanism for plugins to return structured data 440134714 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1