issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 1126604194 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
issue 1
- datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1032057472 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032057472 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g_KA | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:50:01Z | 2022-02-07T23:50:01Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | ||
1032050489 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032050489 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g9c5 | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:39:11Z | 2022-02-07T23:42:08Z | OWNER | That implementation broke on Python 3.6 - which is still a supported Python version for the 0.60.x branch - ```
I could say that I'm going to use a different idiom for order-preserving de-duplication from this StackOverflow instead. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | |
1032037391 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032037391 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g6QP | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:21:07Z | 2022-02-07T23:21:07Z | OWNER | For the record, here's the code that picks the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | |
1032036525 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032036525 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g6Ct | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:19:59Z | 2022-02-07T23:19:59Z | OWNER | I'm going to fix this in the CLI code itself, rather than fixing it in the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | |
1032034015 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032034015 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g5bf | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:17:57Z | 2022-02-07T23:17:57Z | OWNER | I'm going to fix this in a 0.60.2 bug fix release. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | |
1032032686 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032032686 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g5Gu | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:16:10Z | 2022-02-07T23:16:10Z | OWNER | I found this bug while trying to get the following to work:
I want this to create any missing database files on startup out of that literal list of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1